perm filename FELDST.REV[ESS,JMC]1 blob
sn#068079 filedate 1973-10-22 generic text, type T, neo UTF8
00100 Martin Feldstein in \F1The Economics of the New
00200 Unemployment\F0 seems implicitly to have the following model of the
00300 jobs available to disadvantaged workers and paying near the minimum
00400 wage.
00500
00600 The job is "dead end" and "has no future", but if only the
00700 employer didn't have to pay the minimum wage he could combine it with
00800 training for a better job. It can also be made more attractive so
00900 there will be less labor turnover.
01000
01100 My problem in believing this is that I can't think of any
01200 examples that have this characteristic. The jobs I know that pay
01300 near the minimum wage are dishwasher, counterman, houseworker, movie
01400 usher, and service station attendant. It seems to me that these jobs
01500 have the following characteristics:
01600
01700 1. They cannot be eliminated at the present level of
01800 technology. Several millions of people have to be found to do them.
01900
02000 2. They cannot be enriched in a significant way. They can be
02100 made to pay better and the working conditions can be improved. There
02200 is no way of doubling the productivity of a movie usher or a
02300 houseworker by training. Of course, some countermen can be trained
02400 to become hamburger stand managers, but this won't reduce the
02500 requirement for countermen.
02600
02700 To the extent that the low paying jobs satisfy this model
02800 rather than Feldstein's, we come to the conclusion that the minimum
02900 wage ought to be increased rather than reduced. This will presumably
03000 increase the attractiveness of these jobs relative to the various
03100 ways of getting money without working. It is also fairer.
03200
03300 Of cou←se, if the jobs are intrinsically uninteresting, then
03400 increasing the pay will cause some people to work less in order to
03500 have more leisure. This should be accepted as a desirable
03600 development, and as Feldstein suggests, the unemployment insurance
03700 laws should be reworked so that this voluntary idleness doesn't get
03800 confused with real unemployment. Moreover, if increasing the minimum
03900 wage causes some of these jobs to be eliminated by mechanization -
04000 good riddance. Increasing aggregate demand will get new jobs, and
04100 the more efficient economy will make more money available for doing
04200 good.
04300
04400 I fear that if Feldstein's proposals are adopted, instead of
04500 handing the new movie usher a flashlight and starting him to work at
04600 $1.60 per hour, they will start him at $1.20 an hour but enrich his
04700 life with two hours a day of lectures and laboratory on how to repair
04800 the flashlight and how to place the people with bags of popcorn so
04900 they won't disturb others. He will also have to read /F1The Fall of
05000 the House of Usher\F1 in order to pass the course. Of course, the
05100 job will have a potential future - he can aspire to become a lecturer
05200 in usherology. When job turnover increases, the administrators of the
05300 usher training program will propose more intensive lectures, financed
05400 perhaps, by reducing further the stipend of the trainees.
05500
05600 Kidding aside, would Professor Feldstein care to estimate the
05700 numbers of jobs satisfying the two models?